Talk:Gnaiger 2019 MitoFit Preprints: Difference between revisions
From Bioblast
Beno Marija (talk | contribs) |
Beno Marija (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::* ''Fantastic initiative with the new mitochondrial physiologyΒ preprint server!Β '' | :::* ''Fantastic initiative with the new mitochondrial physiologyΒ preprint server!Β '' | ||
:::* ''However - just a note about pre-prints. A significant portion of scientists that I collaborate with feel uncomfortable submitting manuscript on a pre-print server. Is this something that could be addressed maybe in an article regarding the benefits and nuances of pre-print server submission.'' Β | :::* ''However - just a note about pre-prints. A significant portion of scientists that I collaborate with feel uncomfortable submitting manuscript on a pre-print server. Is this something that could be addressed maybe in an article regarding the benefits and nuances of pre-print server submission.'' Β | ||
:::* ''It is a great step towards the publication of the manuscript and congratulations for creating your own tool to circumvent decisions that can not be easily understood.'' | :::* ''It is a great step towards the publication of the manuscript and congratulations for creating your own tool to circumvent decisions that can not be easily understood.'' | ||
Β | :::* '''FAQ''' | ||
Β | :::: [[Preprint|MitoPedia:Preprint]] | ||
::: | |||
Β | |||
Β | |||
:::: | |||
== 2019-02-12 Circular to coauthors == | == 2019-02-12 Circular to coauthors == |
Revision as of 14:52, 19 February 2019
Outcome questionnaire
will be uploaded in the beginning of March
Feedback
- Fantastic initiative with the new mitochondrial physiology preprint server!
- However - just a note about pre-prints. A significant portion of scientists that I collaborate with feel uncomfortable submitting manuscript on a pre-print server. Is this something that could be addressed maybe in an article regarding the benefits and nuances of pre-print server submission.
- It is a great step towards the publication of the manuscript and congratulations for creating your own tool to circumvent decisions that can not be easily understood.
2019-02-12 Circular to coauthors
- Dear coauthors,
- The MitoEAGLE manuscript on βMitochondrial respiratory states and ratesβ is now published in MitoFit Preprint Archives as a preprint citable with DOI number with 530 coauthors. The next step will be journal submission:
- Β» http://wiki.oroboros.at/index.php/MitoFit_Preprint_Arch
- Why a new preprint server MitoFit Preprint Arch? β On 2018-12-12 the MitoEAGLE manuscript was submitted to the preprint server www.biorxiv.org/. We are amazed that our manuscript was not accepted:
- Β» http://www.mitoeagle.org/index.php/Talk:MitoEAGLE_preprint_States_and_rates#BIORXIV
- Instead of starting a debate with bioRxiv we started MitoFit Preprint Archives - the Open Access preprint server for mitochondrial physiology
- The first DOI number was allocated to our MitoEAGLE manuscript.
- Your opinion means a lot to us. Therefore we would like to ask you:
- Are you familiar with the concepts of preprints? Y / N
- Will you consider to submit a manuscript to MitoFit Preprint Archives for publication as a preprint? Y / N
- Which alternative preprint server do you prefer? ___________
- The results of this questionnaire will be summarized anonymously on our website (beginning of March).
- Your opinion means a lot to us. Therefore we would like to ask you:
- We thank you for answering these questions in advance and are looking forward to your feedback. In particular, do you have further suggestions for our first journal choice for submission of our manuscript (Cell Metabolism)?
- In the spirit of the bottom-up approach of MitoEAGLE, this is an invitation to join the editorial team (Scientific Advisory Board) of MitoFit Preprint Archives.
- Best regards,
- Erich Gnaiger
- Chair COST Action CA15203 MitoEAGLE
- [email protected] | www.mitoeagle.org
- 2019-02-12: MitoEAGLE Task Group on 'Mitochondrial resipratory states and rates'